Founded
2000
President
Judy Turner
Leaders
Hon. Peter Dunne
Standing for
Party Vote
Video
United Future

United Future is a modern centre party, focused on New Zealand's best interests.UnitedFuture was formed in November 2000 as a combination of United NZ and Future NZ, two centre-based political parties both born out of a desire to give New Zealanders a sensible, family-focussed alternative to the two major parties. We promote strong families and vibrant communities. We seek a fair, and open society, free from poverty, ignorance and prejudice, and based on innovation, self-reliance, justice and integrity in business and personal dealings.

We promote a sustainable environment, access to the outdoors and a competitive economy which encourages growth, prosperity, ownership and opportunity through market policies where possible, and government where necessary.

UnitedFuture is here to make sure commonsense is always at the heart of government. We pride ourselves on keeping governments honest, moderating extremes, and making sure the interests of families and communities are at the very centre of everything we do.

We want all New Zealanders, whatever their background, race or creed, to have the chance to enjoy everything that is good in our country.

New Zealand: The best place to live, work and raise a family.

 

 

Top 5 Issues

  1. Income Sharing

    UnitedFuture believes the tax system should work in the interests of those raising families and it should empower family and community self-sufficiency rather than creating dependency. Income sharing recognises that the spouse or partner who has chosen to work part-time or has opted out of the paid work force in order to raise their children is making a vital contribution to our society.

    Income Sharing means that each partner in a relationship caring for children would be taxed on a 50% share of their combined income, resulting in a significant reduction in total income tax paid by the family.

    Income sharing recognises the costs of raising a family, and in particular, those situations where one parent is either a full-time carer for their children or works part-time. For tax purposes, the income of both parents is combined and then divided equally, which can mean that they pay less tax since it is levied at a lower rate under our progressive taxation system.

    Since the government subsidises childcare for those returning to paid work, it should also acknowledge the contribution of those who have decided to forego their income, in whole or in part, to stay at home with their children.

    UnitedFuture has introduced legislation for an income sharing scheme for parents with dependent children up to the age of 18, in addition to Working for Families and other entitlements.
  2. Flexible Superannuation

    New Zealanders should be able to take superannuation at reduced rates down to 60 or increasingly enhanced rates if they hold off until between 66 and 70, alongside making KiwiSaver compulsory.

    Kiwis would then be able to manage their retirement age and lifestyle – choices they currently do not have – and it would be cost neutral with the current scheme.

    Each year below 65 that superannuation would be claimed down to 60, would see a small reduction, and each year over 65 up to 70, it would be enhanced.

    The final figures used would make it cost-neutral with the superannuation scheme as it stands, with the long term sustainability issue addressed by having compulsory KiwiSaver.

    The sustainability arguments around superannuation, and whether it should be 65 or 67, then become redundant.

    People can then do their own maths and work out what works best for them based on their lifestyle and aspirations.

    It is very simple. Our policy recognises that today people work and stay active for longer – and it is sustainable for New Zealand in the long term when connected to compulsory KiwiSaver, which frankly we need to do as a nation at some point.

    Kiwis will have a working, sustainable and secured retirement future and that is what we need to be working towards.

    In the meantime, what we propose gives them choice about how they want to shape their lives in retirement and when they want to begin.
  3. Caring for Senior Citizens

    UnitedFuture has two key policies to keep older New Zealanders warmer and healthier. Both are about making New Zealand the kind of country it should be and make economic sense.

    1. Subsidise the power bills of over-65s by $50 per month for the three coldest months of the year – June, July and August – so our seniors can afford to keep warm

    2. A free ‘Warrant of Fitness’ annual health check for those over-65 to identify health problems and illness early

    It is the decent thing to do in terms of how we treat the elderly in our country.

    Times are tough, but if you cut too many corners you end up with a false economy – and a very harsh country.

    Each winter, on average an extra 3000 people a month are hospitalised at a cost to taxpayers of about $880 a day, and a great many of those people are elderly – that adds up to about $243 million in extra hospital costs each winter.

    We have got to stop just looking at the initial cost of schemes, and measure them against what they save in the longer term through people being healthier and not being in our hospitals, and frankly, not dying because they get cold and sick.

    We save cents and lose dollars. It is a false economy and we see it too often.

    Put that $243 million for increased winter hospitalisation up against our Winter Warmer policy cost of about $57 million to help keep a lot of elderly well, warm and out of hospital.

    Death rates also jump 18 percent over winter – many of them elderly.

    The subsidy could be implemented by a rebate on the power bill to be claimed back by the power company.

    The $25 cost of the annual Warrant of Fitness health check for each senior citizen would be tiny when balanced against the $880 a day hospital tab picked up by the taxpayer when conditions not got on to early are far more serious and far more expensive to treat.

    The combined cost of the two policies if fully taken up by all senior citizens would be about $71.5 million – $57 million for the power bill subsidy and $14.5 million for the WOF annual health check.

    Given the benefits that would come from these policies, they would be extraordinarily economical.
  4. Asset Sales

    he National has a manifesto that includes asset sales. New Zealanders need to start a proper debate on the future limits of those sales.

    To this point there has not been a proper national debate beyond National saying yes and Labour saying no.

    We need a conversation that is more detailed and drills down into what New Zealanders really think are acceptable bottom lines.

    New Zealanders are not definitively pro-asset sales, but under certain conditions, it is no longer the bogeyman issue that Labour would have you believe.

    UnitedFuture’s role as a support partner is not just to contribute its own policies, but to help keep a government to a reasonable, centrist path.

    UnitedFuture says let’s start with three no-go areas where there would be no asset sales, not now, not ever

    Kiwibank, Radio New Zealand and the water supply should be ruled out of any future asset sales programmes

    Kiwibank is in every sense now a national institution, whether you bank with it or not. And in a market full of Australian-owned banks, and an increasingly fraught and troubled globe, it is both a symbolic and practical statement of our economic sovereignty. Collectively, it is ours pure and simple. It must stay that way.

    Radio New Zealand exists in an increasingly commercial media marketplace, and it is more important than ever to have a voice that does not bend to the dollar, to ratings, to external forces. Every nation needs its own voice and we need to afford that voice our collective protection.

    Water. UnitedFuture does not intend to wait until it is on the asset sales agenda. New Zealanders would never – or should never – accept a sell-off of the supply of the water, or any of the aspects around it.

    In addition, with regard to Asset Sales, UnitedFurure will insist that:

    - The New Zealand Government retains majority control (51%)

    - Shareholding by private investors be capped at 15%

    - New Zealand household investors are given preferential purchase right at time of issue.
  5. Outdoor Recreation

    UnitedFuture believes that all New Zealanders have a birthright to enjoy our unique, diverse landscape. Our strong outdoor heritage is central to what it means to be a Kiwi.

    Our key policies to achieve this are:

    * Enshrining public access to all public resources, including game, waterways and coastline, in law.

    * Establishing a robust National Environmental Standard for all freshwater waterways.

    * Curtailing the application of 1080 poison and replacing it with new and more environmentally friendly forms of pest-control.

    * Imposing a moratorium on new hydro and irrigation schemes for rivers without existing dams and still regarded to be ‘wild’.

    * Prohibit heli-hunting, herding or hazing from helicopters except for legitimate animal management operations when numbers warrant it.
    * Make sure the Game Animal Council Bill, currently before Parliament is passed, and the Game Animal Council is established as a statutory body.
    * Work with the recreational fishing sector to establish a public consultation process regarding the future of inshore fisheries management. This will include whether a statutory management organisation 'run by fishers for fishers' should be established.

 

 

See all our policies at www.unitedfuture.org.nz

 

 

 

 

Authorised by Hon. Peter Dunne of Parliament Buildings, Wellington

Questions answered by United Future

Question

United Future's Reply

If MMP stays - would you make any changes?

We would advocate for

1. A changed threshold- probably 4%

2. A possible change to STV for selecting electorate MPs

3. More MPs with specific representation roles ie smaller electorates and less list MPs

4. Use of Citizen Initiated Refernda on key matters of national importance (has been our policy for many years)

check out other candidate's answers